Ludum Dare #51compo
Der Schließmuskel
A game about quality control. Make sure only the best quality produce reaches the taste tester.
_Headphones recommended_
Unity 2021.3.11f1
Clip Studio Paint 1.12.3
Audacity 3.1.3
Enjoy :8ball:
_Headphones recommended_
Tools
Unity 2021.3.11f1
Clip Studio Paint 1.12.3
Audacity 3.1.3
Enjoy :8ball:



Comments16
Might be better if you had less than 10 seconds to QC, actually. As it is, it's just kind of impossible to see if they're good or not, maybe because there's no template to compare them too. Might be more rewarding if the time controls were tighter, but the defects more noticeable. Hee-hee, I said "tighter".
Too bad that there's only music on the menu, but not ingame.
I'm not really sure how to suggest improvements, because I lack the artistic vision for... this.
Kind of wish there was some sort of indication of how I was going as I played (rather than at the end.. also the score at the end only showed up for a split second). Also 50 was a lot to get through would have preferred a smaller loop (maybe 20) but I'm impatient I prefer to do more smaller runs.
Regardless of my feelings, it's undeniably pretty well done, controls well, good use of physics, attention to detail with animations and sound effects. There's certainly a vision here, even if I can't suss out what it's conveying. Technically well done but not at all for me 😁
1. ah, German title; time to put that self-taught German learning (including Duolingo) to use! :) Checking *Schließmuskel* on a dictionary (I only knew *schließen* ‘close’ and *Muskel* ‘muscle’ independently): this means ‘sphincter’… O_o Now, what is this game all about?! XD
2. title screen: very nice artistic effect, with the blurring for the foreground character, and the (voluntarily) dissonant music
3. interface is super intuitive, with how the hand visually pinches; I like the extendable arm!
4. OH MY GOD, but this is HORRIBLE!!
Takeaway: artistically speaking, the game stands somewhere at the top of the heap (my literal programmer (programming!) art feels like nothing compared to this). As for gameplay, although the basic concept and interface makes itself quickly intuitively clear (which is no small thing), I tried all the while to see what the precise *criteria* could be, but am still unsure. (This may be me! Still, I would advise giving some more explanations on the page or/and comments, to better understand the game.) Anyway, there is apparently a total lack of punishment for not doing the ‘job’ correctly; maybe there is a bonus for a sequence of correct matches? Or maybe this is more of an implicitly (!) ‘narrative’ game, as an absurd fable. (A mix between the hideous reality of slaughterhouses and Milgram experiment?) Pseudo-edit (because I composed the conclusion before finishing): it turns out there *is* an estimation (and thus incentive), but only at the end! This means the problem lies in the lack of *feedback* while playing: I feel there should really be something that tells us whether the match was correct or not (for example, the eater could moan if given an improper little guy). And a smaller total amount would help making the player want to replay to try beating his score.
This was artistically impressive, and at the same time… horrible. :o Still, thank you for the vision; although you may have programmed my next nightmare!! XD
---
@indigo There IS in-game music!
---
@thaprofesional
> the score at the end only showed up for a split second
I think this is caused by quitting the screen with pressing any button (as for the title screen). Not sure though, but I voluntarily let it for a moment (wary because of said title screen!) to hear the music!
I will address a couple of points as your feedback was so well thought out.
The lack of guidance, that is intentional. You are supposed to have confusion and a sense of not getting it, or to even give up caring about which are good/bad.
There is a strict criteria for good produce. The arms must be the same length as the legs, which must be the same length as the body, and must be the same length as the head. The poster only hints at this, again on purpose. Bad produce sometimes also has an off colour to help with selection.
There is a little bit of feedback when you select good/bad produce. The mangler has a light that turns red when good produce is mangled, green for bad produce. The taste-tester burps if given bad produce, it makes him gassy, and gives an 'mmmmm' for good produce.
Other than those clarifications everything you said was bang on. Thank you for the feedback :8ball: